|
|
Biography
Simon Penny is an Australian artist, theorist, theacher and curator in
the field of electronic and interactive Media Art. His art practice
consists of interactive and robotic installations, which have been
exhibited in the US, Australia and Europe. His most recent project is
the Autonomous Robotic Artwork "Petit Mal". He is Associate Professor of
Art and Robotics at Carnegie Mellon University where, among other
things, he teaches Robotic Art Studio. During his 6 years in the USA he
has established the Electronic Intermedia Program at the University of
Florida; curated Machine Culture (at SIGGRAPH 93 in Anaheim, CA), and
has edited the anthology "Critical Issues in Electronic Media" (SUNY
Press 1995).
Quotes
Simon Penny
Artistic Practice, Body Knowledge and the Engineering World View.
"I will argue that "mind" does not exist. What do I mean by this absurd
proposition? I mean that mind is a linguistic construction, a concept.
The problem for us is not the existence of the concept per se, but that
the concept "mind" has become reified, the assuption of the existence of
something called a mind has led to the building of an entire conceptual
and linguistic edifice. Hence, to argue for the non-existence of mind is
an elusive task, not because mind does exist, but because of the
mind-body split is fully installed in our language. We struggle when
there are no words, when the words that exist undermine the goal of the
task at hand. (...) I will not argue that we privilege "mind" too much,
nor that we ought to privilege "body". This would be to perpetuate a
dualistic model. I want to argue against dualism. (...) Why is it that
we believe that consciousness is located exclusively in the brain? (...)
I want in all seriousness to argue that I "think/know" with my arms and
with my stomach. (...) The mind/body split concept is a key component of
the enlightenment world view and structures the way we think about
ourselves and the world. Computer discourse is a direct descendant of
that world view, made more extreme by the pragmatism of engineering. The
reification of the mind/body split within computer systems and computer
discourse has lent the idea new force. But contemporary thinking in many
fields is bringing many basic premises of computer science into
question. A concerted effort is now necessary to denaturalize the
mind/body split and to re-learn that subjectivity is not subject to
reductive analysis. Subjecthood is anchored in the body. What we call
‘the mind’ permeates the body and is not located in any organ. To
believe otherwise is to deny traditional intelligences of the arts."
|