..................... | ...... | mailing list archive |
..... | ||
HOME
SEARCH FAQ |
Main IndexRe: LIFESCIENCE: Re: A Reactionary Reaction
--------------------------------------------------------- ARS ELECTRONICA FESTIVAL 99 LIFESCIENCE Linz, Austria, September 04 - 09 http://www.aec.at/lifescience --------------------------------------------------------- One of the things I would love to see begin happening on this net symposium is some critical, creative, and problematizing work done on the familiar categories of "art" and "science." On the one hand it would seem naive to suppose that we can simply break out of the supposedly repressive constraints of categorization; in addition all of our activities as artists, scientists, cultural theorists, are always already enframed by a complex network of discourses, institutions, policies, norms, and of course media. But on the other the breadth, potential, and complexity of fields such as autopoiesis, transgenic art, and tissue engineering, as well as other, more familiar art-technology hybrids, all suggests that perhaps our modern disciplinary epistemes are currently being refigured, renegotiated, transformed. By who and for who is another important question. But there is a sense in which reducing the work of, say, Humberto Maturana or Mongrel to "science" or "art" is in some significant way reductive. Trevor: > Concidering the current "Lifescience" discussion takes place within an > artistic context, it is perhaps not surprising that there is a general > ondertone that Science is dangerous and frightening (although potentially > useful) but fortunately we have Art which will save the world from all things > evil. Birgit: no that is not the point for me. The point is not either that art itself has to become evil. I mean in just like Niklas Luhmann told us, that art will produce the objects for communication in the field of lifesciences. I think that we need to begin to develop some kind of working-definition or at least field of questioning with regard to these historically well-established categorical markers. Several questions: - What are the boundaries, outlines, and silhouettes which demarcate the disciplines of art and science for us in the West? Are these markers institutional (the gallery/the lab; the art school/the med school; Duchamp, Haacke, Orlan - just brainstorming here...) - that is, are they conditioned by the context within which certain activity takes place? Or are they rooted in the discourses and knowledges which are said to constitute a discipline (anatomical knowledge of the body; sculptural knowledge of the body; the medical body; the dancer's body; motion-capture...)? Or is it defined by the way in which the knowledge/discourse networks are put into practice and implemented within the social (Beuys, Situationists, RAFI, ECD, SuperWeed....)? - I mentioned the word "problematize" above, & I was specifically thinking of some comments Foucault made on his own methodology - bascially he referred to "problematization" as a way of asking how something becomes a problem. Not causes, teleologies, agencies, but the different elements whereby something is brought up as a problem. For instance, these sharply differentiated roles between science and art are, I would suggest, modern inventions - in other words, it doesn't necessarily go without saying that science is not art and vice-versa - these relationships, in the West, had to be established thru a variety of means. How did that happen, say, during the early Renaissance? How did it happen w/ the various art & technology movements of the 60s? How is it happening now w/ net.art? -- ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// bio_informatics //////////// http://gsa.rutgers.edu/maldoror/index.html /////////////////////////////////// ftp_formless_anatomy ///// http://www.formless.org ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// [techne] New Media + Digital Art ////////////////// http://www.technenet.org ////////////////////////////////////////////////////// contact maldoror@eden.rutgers.edu /////////////////////////// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to the English language version of LIFESCIENCE To unsubscribe the English language version send mail to lifescience-en-request@aec.at (message text 'unsubscribe') Send contributions to lifescience@aec.at --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|